Benefit of Self-monitoring of Anticoagulation Instrument (4A)
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
To evaluate the benefit economic and medical of self-monitoring of coagulation compared with conventional follow-up of anticoagulation in a population recently fitted with mechanical heart valves.
| Condition | Intervention |
|---|---|
|
Mechanical Prosthetic Heart Valve Implantation Patient Self Monitoring of Oral Anticoagulent Therapy |
Device: INRatio / Coaguchek XS Device: Conventional follow-up of anti-coagulation |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Open Label |
| Official Title: | Economic and Medical Evaluation of Self-monitoring of Anticoagulation in a Population of Patients Recently Fitted With a Mechanical Heart Valve Compared to Conventional Anticoagulation Follow-up |
- Economic and medical evaluation of self-monitoring of coagulation compared with conventional follow-up of anticoagulation in a population recently fitted with mechanical heart valves. [ Time Frame: 12 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- - the impact of complications stemming from oral anticoagulant treatment (bleeding, thromboembolic episodes or death) within a population recently fitted with a mechanical hear valve. [ Time Frame: 12 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- the proportion of monthly measurements of INR within the designated range [ Time Frame: 12 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- the inherent cost of each strategy of anticoagulation monitoring [ Time Frame: 12 month ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
| Enrollment: | 919 |
| Study Start Date: | June 2007 |
| Study Completion Date: | February 2010 |
| Primary Completion Date: | February 2010 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
No Intervention: 1
Conventional follow-up of anticoagulation
|
Device: Conventional follow-up of anti-coagulation
At least, one follow-up of INR per month. Measured in laboratory.
|
|
Experimental: 2
Self-monitoring of anticoagulation
|
Device: INRatio / Coaguchek XS
INR measured by patient himself using INRation or Coaguchek device. And one follow-up of INR per month, measured in laboratory.
|
Hide Detailed DescriptionDetailed Description:
Rationale/context:
Long term management of anticoagulant treatment is not straightforward, especially in patients bearing mechanical heart valves due to the requirement of maintaining a high INR over a narrow range.
Due to the narrow therapeutic window of AVK, undesirable events (hemorrhages, thromboembolic accidents) tend to be both serious and common leading to frequent admissions to hospital The self-monitoring of AVK, in addition to conventional monitoring of INR in the laboratory, is now being introduced in several countries (USA and Europe).
Main objective To evaluate the benefit economic and medical of self-monitoring of coagulation compared with conventional follow-up of anticoagulation in a population recently fitted with mechanical heart valves.
Secondary objectives
To compare over one year the effect of self-monitoring of coagulation with conventional follow-up of anticoagulation on:
- the impact of complications stemming from oral anticoagulant treatment (bleeding, thromboembolic episodes or death
- the proportion of monthly values of INR within the target range,
- the inherent cost of each strategy of monitoring of anticoagulation,
- the incidence of death, bleeding and thromboembolic episodes (each studied separately)
- The quality of life and the satisfaction of the patient To evaluate the patients' learning to be autonomous Diagram of the study Progress of the trial
A national, multicenter, randomized, blind trial, designed to examine the type of strategy used for monitoring anticoagulation in two parallel groups:
- a conventional follow-up of anticoagulation (monthly checks and adjustment of INR by the family doctor (GP))
- a self-measurement of anticoagulation by the patient at home using a Roche Diagnostics Laboratories test CoaguChek XS® or the Hemosense laboratories test INRatio® (weekly measurements and adjustment of INR by the family doctor) + a monthly laboratory check of INR
Inclusion criteria:
- adults (age ≥ 18 years), either sex
- patients fitted with one or more mechanical heart valves either alone or in combination with myocardial revascularization
- oral anticoagulant treatment
- patients with social security cover
- written informed consent signed by both patient and investigator Exclusion criteria
- women pregnant or liable to become pregnant during the study
- nursing women
- patients unable to master the self-monitoring procedures
- individuals under judicial control or enquiry
- patients consuming excessive amounts of alcohol ((>40g/j for men et >30g/j for women femmes ; 1 glass = 10g)
- patients on dialysis
- patients with incomplete understanding of instructions
- blind patients and those unable to read
- presence of circulating anticoagulant
Treatments/Strategies/Procedures:
1.1. Strategies of anticoagulation monitoring
After signature of informed consent and verification of criteria of eligibility, patients are randomly allocated into the following groups:
1.1.1. Conventional follow-up of anticoagulation In this group, the patients are instructed in the use of oral anticoagulants. INR is measured once a month in the laboratory. INR must lie in the therapeutic range designated by the investigative center as a function of the type and the location of the valve and any associated risk factors. If necessary, the family doctor adjusts INR on the day of the blood test and a new measurement is taken 48 hours later if dosage has been changed.
This algorithm is applied until the INR comes into the designated range.
1.1.2. Self-measurement of anticoagulation In this group, the patients are instructed in the use and monitoring of oral anticoagulants. They are further trained in the use of the self-monitoring test system.
Reference INR will be INR labo during first post operatives weeks up to the return at home because the self-measurement of anticoagulation maybe for lack of the fact of the anaemia, the inflammatory syndrome and the residues of heparin.
When the patients return at home, they take a measurement every week and if the result is abnormal, inform their family doctor. The INR must lie within the therapeutic range designated by the investigative center as a function of the type and the location of the valve and any associated risk factors. If necessary, the family doctor adjusts the INR on the same day as the self-measurement. A measurement is taken 48 hours later if the dosage has been changed.
This algorithm is applied until the INR comes into the designated range. INR is measured in the laboratory every month.
Main evaluation criteria:
Economic and medical evaluation of self-monitoring of coagulation compared with conventional follow-up of anticoagulation in a population recently fitted with mechanical heart valves.
Main secondary evaluation criteria:
- the impact of complications stemming from oral anticoagulant treatment (bleeding, thromboembolic episodes or death) within a population recently fitted with a mechanical hear valve.
- the proportion of monthly measurements of INR within the designated range,
- the inherent cost of each strategy of anticoagulation monitoring,
- the impact of death, bleeding and thromboembolic episodes (each studied separately),
- Evaluation of patients' learning of monitoring procedures.
Planned population size: 1050 patients, i.e.
- 350 in the group "Conventional follow-up of anticoagulation"
700 in the group "Self-measurement of anticoagulation" :
- 350 using the Roche Diagnostics laboratories test CoaguChek XS®
- 350 using the Hemosense laboratories test INRatio®
Time-line:
- Period of inclusion: 12-18 months
- Duration of participation by patients: 12 months
- Duration of trial: 30 months
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years and older |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- adults
- patients fitted with one or more mechanical heart valves either alone or in combination with myocardial revascularization
- oral anticoagulant treatment
- patients with social security cover
- written informed consent signed by both patient and investigator
Exclusion Criteria:
- women pregnant or liable to become pregnant during the study
- nursing women
- patients unable to master the self-monitoring procedures
- individuals under judicial control or enquiry
- patients consuming excessive amounts of alcohol ((>40g/j for men et >30g/j for women femmes ; 1 glass = 10g)
- patients on dialysis
- patients with incomplete understanding of instructions
- blind patients and those unable to read
- presence of circulating anticoagulant
Contacts and Locations| France | |
| Pôle Cardio-Thoracique - Hôpital Cardiologique du Haut-Lévêque - CHU de Bordeaux - Avenue de Magellan | |
| PESSAC Cedex, France, 33604 | |
| Study Director: | Raymond ROUDAUT, Pr | University Hospital, Bordeaux |
| Study Chair: | Geneviève CHENE, Pr | University Hospital, Bordeaux |
| Principal Investigator: | Raymond ROUDAUT, Pr | University Hospital, Bordeaux |
More Information
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | Jean-Pierre LEROY / Clinical Research and Innovation Director, University Hospital, Bordeaux |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00506870 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | CHUBX2006/04, 2006/019 |
| Study First Received: | July 23, 2007 |
| Last Updated: | December 13, 2010 |
| Health Authority: | France: Afssaps - Agence française de sécurité sanitaire des produits de santé (Saint-Denis) |
Keywords provided by University Hospital, Bordeaux:
|
Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation INR self monitoring cost benefit evaluation |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 23, 2013