Quetiapine XR Versus Sertraline in Acute Bipolar Depression as add-on Therapy
This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
AstraZeneca
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
AstraZeneca
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00857584
First received: March 5, 2009
Last updated: April 16, 2012
Last verified: March 2012
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- Study Results
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Results First Received: February 6, 2012
| Study Type: | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized; Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study; Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment; Masking: Open Label; Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Conditions: |
Bipolar Disorder Bipolar Depression |
| Interventions: |
Drug: Extended release quetiapine (quetiapine XR) Drug: Sertraline Drug: adequate mood stabilizer |
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details
| Key information relevant to the recruitment process for the overall study, such as dates of the recruitment period and locations |
|---|
| No text entered. |
Pre-Assignment Details
| Significant events and approaches for the overall study following participant enrollment, but prior to group assignment |
|---|
| No text entered. |
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Quetiapine Extended Release | Extended release quetiapine (quetiapine XR) - flexible dose from 300 to 600 mg/d (combination of tablets of 50mg, 200mg and 300mg) oral, daily, 8 weeks length. |
| Setraline | Sertraline - flexible dose from 50 to 200 mg/d (combination of tablets of 50mg and 100mg) oral, daily, 8 weeks length. |
Participant Flow: Overall Study
| Quetiapine Extended Release | Setraline | |
|---|---|---|
| STARTED | 14 | 13 |
| Week 1 | 14 | 13 |
| Week 2 | 14 | 11 |
| Week 4 | 11 | 9 |
| Week 8 | 10 | 8 |
| COMPLETED | 10 | 8 |
| NOT COMPLETED | 4 | 5 |
| Lack of Efficacy | 1 | 2 |
| Adverse Event | 2 | 2 |
| Physician Decision | 1 | 1 |
Baseline Characteristics
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Quetiapine Extended Release | Extended release quetiapine (quetiapine XR) - flexible dose from 300 to 600 mg/d (combination of tablets of 50mg, 200mg and 300mg) oral, daily, 8 weeks length. |
| Setraline | Sertraline - flexible dose from 50 to 200 mg/d (combination of tablets of 50mg and 100mg) oral, daily, 8 weeks length. |
| Total | Total of all reporting groups |
Baseline Measures
| Quetiapine Extended Release | Setraline | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants
[units: participants] |
14 | 13 | 27 |
|
Age
[units: years] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
48.5 ± 12.5 | 43.3 ± 12.6 | 46.07 ± 12.6 |
|
Gender
[units: Participants] |
|||
| Female | 6 | 4 | 10 |
| Male | 8 | 9 | 17 |
|
Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score, Continuous
[1] [units: score on a scale] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
29.5 ± 5.0 | 28.2 ± 5.8 | 28.9 ± 5.3 |
|
Clinical Impression Global Scale - Bipolar total score (CGI-BP-M), Continuous
[2] [units: score on a scale] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
5.1 ± 0.7 | 5.3 ± 0.8 | 5.2 ± 0.8 |
|
Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HARS) total score, Continuous
[3] [units: score on a scale] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
22.4 ± 4.03 | 17.6 ± 4.46 | 20.04 ± 7.38 |
| [1] | MADRS assesses severity of depressive symptoms. It ranges from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 60 (higher scores indicating a greater severity of depressive symptoms) |
|---|---|
| [2] | CGI-BP-M assesses severity of clinical status. It ranges from a minimum of 1 to a maximum of 7 (higher scores indicating a greater clinical severity) |
| [3] | HARS assesses severity of anxiety symptoms. It ranges from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 56 (higher scores indicating a greater severity of anxiety symptoms) |
Outcome Measures
| 1. Primary: | The Mean Change From Baseline to Week 2 in the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score [ Time Frame: baseline, week 2 ] |
| 2. Secondary: | The Mean Change From Baseline to Week 1 in the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score [ Time Frame: baseline, week 1 ] |
| 3. Secondary: | The Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score [ Time Frame: baseline, week 4 ] |
| 4. Secondary: | The Mean Change From Baseline to Week 8 in the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score [ Time Frame: baseline. week 8 ] |
| 5. Secondary: | The Mean Change From Baseline to Week 1 in the Clinical Impression Global Scale - Bipolar (CGI-BP-M) Total Score [ Time Frame: baseline, week 1 ] |
| 6. Secondary: | The Mean Change From Baseline to Week 2 in the Clinical Impression Global Scale - Bipolar (CGI-BP-M) Total Score [ Time Frame: baseline, week 2 ] |
| 7. Secondary: | The Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Clinical Impression Global Scale - Bipolar (CGI-BP-M) Total Score [ Time Frame: baseline, week 4 ] |
| 8. Secondary: | The Mean Change From Baseline to Week 8 in the Clinical Impression Global Scale - Bipolar (CGI-BP-M) Total Score [ Time Frame: baseline, week 8 ] |
| 9. Secondary: | The Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HARS) Total Score [ Time Frame: baseline, week 4 ] |
| 10. Secondary: | The Mean Change From Baseline to Week 8 in the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HARS) Total Score [ Time Frame: baseline, week 8 ] |
| 11. Secondary: | Number of Patients Response at Week 1 [ Time Frame: week 1 ] |
| 12. Secondary: | Number of Patients With Response at Week 2 [ Time Frame: week 2 ] |
| 13. Secondary: | Number of Patients With Response at Week 4. [ Time Frame: week 4 ] |
| 14. Secondary: | Number of Patients With Response at Week 8. [ Time Frame: week 8 ] |
Hide Outcome Measure 14| Measure Type | Secondary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Number of Patients With Response at Week 8. |
| Measure Description |
Number of patients responded to the treatment at week 8, where response is defined as ≥ 50% reduction in the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score from baseline to week 8. MADRS assesses severity of depressive symptoms. It ranges from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 60 (higher scores indicating a greater severity of depressive symptoms. |
| Time Frame | week 8 |
| Safety Issue | No |
Population Description
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| Efficacy analyses of the intent-to-treat (ITT) population (those who received at least one dose of the study medication and had at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment) were conducted using ANCOVA and last observation carried forward (LOCF) methodology. |
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Quetiapine Extended Release | Extended release quetiapine (quetiapine XR) - flexible dose from 300 to 600 mg/d (combination of tablets of 50mg, 200mg and 300mg) oral, daily, 8 weeks length. |
| Setraline | Sertraline - flexible dose from 50 to 200 mg/d (combination of tablets of 50mg and 100mg) oral, daily, 8 weeks length. |
Measured Values
| Quetiapine Extended Release | Setraline | |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
10 | 8 |
|
Number of Patients With Response at Week 8.
[units: Participants] |
8 | 5 |
No statistical analysis provided for Number of Patients With Response at Week 8.
| 15. Secondary: | Number of Patients With Remission at Week 1. [ Time Frame: week 1 ] |
| 16. Secondary: | Number of Patients With Remission at Week 2. [ Time Frame: week 2 ] |
| 17. Secondary: | Number of Patients With Remission at Week 4. [ Time Frame: week 4 ] |
| 18. Secondary: | Number of Patients With Remission at Week 8. [ Time Frame: week 8 ] |
More Information
Certain Agreements:
Limitations and Caveats
Results Point of Contact:
No publications provided
| Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study. |
| There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed. |
Limitations and Caveats
| Limitations of the study, such as early termination leading to small numbers of participants analyzed and technical problems with measurement leading to unreliable or uninterpretable data |
|---|
| No text entered. |
Results Point of Contact:
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | AstraZeneca |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00857584 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | D1443L00058 |
| Study First Received: | March 5, 2009 |
| Results First Received: | February 6, 2012 |
| Last Updated: | April 16, 2012 |
| Health Authority: | Spain: Comité Ético de Investigación Clínica Spain: Spanish Agency of Medicines |