Quetiapine XR Versus Sertraline in Acute Bipolar Depression as add-on Therapy
This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
AstraZeneca
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
AstraZeneca
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00857584
First received: March 5, 2009
Last updated: April 16, 2012
Last verified: March 2012
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- Study Results
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Results First Received: February 6, 2012
| Study Type: | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized; Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study; Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment; Masking: Open Label; Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Conditions: |
Bipolar Disorder Bipolar Depression |
| Interventions: |
Drug: Extended release quetiapine (quetiapine XR) Drug: Sertraline Drug: adequate mood stabilizer |
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details
| Key information relevant to the recruitment process for the overall study, such as dates of the recruitment period and locations |
|---|
| No text entered. |
Pre-Assignment Details
| Significant events and approaches for the overall study following participant enrollment, but prior to group assignment |
|---|
| No text entered. |
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Quetiapine Extended Release | Extended release quetiapine (quetiapine XR) - flexible dose from 300 to 600 mg/d (combination of tablets of 50mg, 200mg and 300mg) oral, daily, 8 weeks length. |
| Setraline | Sertraline - flexible dose from 50 to 200 mg/d (combination of tablets of 50mg and 100mg) oral, daily, 8 weeks length. |
Participant Flow: Overall Study
| Quetiapine Extended Release | Setraline | |
|---|---|---|
| STARTED | 14 | 13 |
| Week 1 | 14 | 13 |
| Week 2 | 14 | 11 |
| Week 4 | 11 | 9 |
| Week 8 | 10 | 8 |
| COMPLETED | 10 | 8 |
| NOT COMPLETED | 4 | 5 |
| Lack of Efficacy | 1 | 2 |
| Adverse Event | 2 | 2 |
| Physician Decision | 1 | 1 |
Baseline Characteristics
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Quetiapine Extended Release | Extended release quetiapine (quetiapine XR) - flexible dose from 300 to 600 mg/d (combination of tablets of 50mg, 200mg and 300mg) oral, daily, 8 weeks length. |
| Setraline | Sertraline - flexible dose from 50 to 200 mg/d (combination of tablets of 50mg and 100mg) oral, daily, 8 weeks length. |
| Total | Total of all reporting groups |
Baseline Measures
| Quetiapine Extended Release | Setraline | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants
[units: participants] |
14 | 13 | 27 |
|
Age
[units: years] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
48.5 ± 12.5 | 43.3 ± 12.6 | 46.07 ± 12.6 |
|
Gender
[units: Participants] |
|||
| Female | 6 | 4 | 10 |
| Male | 8 | 9 | 17 |
|
Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score, Continuous
[1] [units: score on a scale] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
29.5 ± 5.0 | 28.2 ± 5.8 | 28.9 ± 5.3 |
|
Clinical Impression Global Scale - Bipolar total score (CGI-BP-M), Continuous
[2] [units: score on a scale] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
5.1 ± 0.7 | 5.3 ± 0.8 | 5.2 ± 0.8 |
|
Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HARS) total score, Continuous
[3] [units: score on a scale] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
22.4 ± 4.03 | 17.6 ± 4.46 | 20.04 ± 7.38 |
| [1] | MADRS assesses severity of depressive symptoms. It ranges from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 60 (higher scores indicating a greater severity of depressive symptoms) |
|---|---|
| [2] | CGI-BP-M assesses severity of clinical status. It ranges from a minimum of 1 to a maximum of 7 (higher scores indicating a greater clinical severity) |
| [3] | HARS assesses severity of anxiety symptoms. It ranges from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 56 (higher scores indicating a greater severity of anxiety symptoms) |
Outcome Measures
| 1. Primary: | The Mean Change From Baseline to Week 2 in the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score [ Time Frame: baseline, week 2 ] |
| 2. Secondary: | The Mean Change From Baseline to Week 1 in the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score [ Time Frame: baseline, week 1 ] |
| 3. Secondary: | The Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score [ Time Frame: baseline, week 4 ] |
| 4. Secondary: | The Mean Change From Baseline to Week 8 in the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score [ Time Frame: baseline. week 8 ] |
| 5. Secondary: | The Mean Change From Baseline to Week 1 in the Clinical Impression Global Scale - Bipolar (CGI-BP-M) Total Score [ Time Frame: baseline, week 1 ] |
| 6. Secondary: | The Mean Change From Baseline to Week 2 in the Clinical Impression Global Scale - Bipolar (CGI-BP-M) Total Score [ Time Frame: baseline, week 2 ] |
| 7. Secondary: | The Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Clinical Impression Global Scale - Bipolar (CGI-BP-M) Total Score [ Time Frame: baseline, week 4 ] |
| 8. Secondary: | The Mean Change From Baseline to Week 8 in the Clinical Impression Global Scale - Bipolar (CGI-BP-M) Total Score [ Time Frame: baseline, week 8 ] |
| 9. Secondary: | The Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HARS) Total Score [ Time Frame: baseline, week 4 ] |
| 10. Secondary: | The Mean Change From Baseline to Week 8 in the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HARS) Total Score [ Time Frame: baseline, week 8 ] |
| 11. Secondary: | Number of Patients Response at Week 1 [ Time Frame: week 1 ] |
| 12. Secondary: | Number of Patients With Response at Week 2 [ Time Frame: week 2 ] |
| 13. Secondary: | Number of Patients With Response at Week 4. [ Time Frame: week 4 ] |
| 14. Secondary: | Number of Patients With Response at Week 8. [ Time Frame: week 8 ] |
| 15. Secondary: | Number of Patients With Remission at Week 1. [ Time Frame: week 1 ] |
| 16. Secondary: | Number of Patients With Remission at Week 2. [ Time Frame: week 2 ] |
| 17. Secondary: | Number of Patients With Remission at Week 4. [ Time Frame: week 4 ] |
| 18. Secondary: | Number of Patients With Remission at Week 8. [ Time Frame: week 8 ] |
More Information
Certain Agreements:
Limitations and Caveats
Results Point of Contact:
No publications provided
| Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study. |
| There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed. |
Limitations and Caveats
| Limitations of the study, such as early termination leading to small numbers of participants analyzed and technical problems with measurement leading to unreliable or uninterpretable data |
|---|
| No text entered. |
Results Point of Contact:
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | AstraZeneca |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00857584 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | D1443L00058 |
| Study First Received: | March 5, 2009 |
| Results First Received: | February 6, 2012 |
| Last Updated: | April 16, 2012 |
| Health Authority: | Spain: Comité Ético de Investigación Clínica Spain: Spanish Agency of Medicines |