Effectiveness of Pacemaker With Closed Loop Stimulation Compared to Pacemakers With and Without Standard Rate Response (CLEAR)
This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
Biotronik, Inc.
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Biotronik, Inc.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00355797
First received: July 21, 2006
Last updated: December 18, 2012
Last verified: December 2012
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- Study Results
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Results First Received: June 6, 2011
| Study Type: | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized; Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study; Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment; Masking: Single Blind (Subject); Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Condition: |
Bradycardia |
| Interventions: |
Device: Closed Loop Stimulation (CLS) Device: Standard Rate Adaptive (R) Technology Device: Non-rate adaptive (DDD) pacing |
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details
| Key information relevant to the recruitment process for the overall study, such as dates of the recruitment period and locations |
|---|
| No text entered. |
Pre-Assignment Details
| Significant events and approaches for the overall study following participant enrollment, but prior to group assignment |
|---|
| No text entered. |
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| CLS Rate Adaptive Pacing | Pacemaker programmed with Closed Loop Stimulation (CLS) rate adaptive technology for long-term study follow-up. |
| Standard Rate Adaptive Pacing | Pacemaker programmed with standard rate adaptive technology (R, accelerometer) for long-term study follow-up. |
| No Rate Adaptive Pacing | Pacemaker programmed with no rate adaption (DDD) for long-term study follow-up. |
Participant Flow: Overall Study
| CLS Rate Adaptive Pacing | Standard Rate Adaptive Pacing | No Rate Adaptive Pacing | |
|---|---|---|---|
| STARTED | 741 | 369 | 381 |
| COMPLETED | 501 | 221 | 239 |
| NOT COMPLETED | 240 | 148 | 142 |
Outcome Measures
| 1. Primary: | Performance of Activities of Daily Living Tests (6-minute Walk and Sweep) [ Time Frame: within 45 days of enrollment ] |
| 2. Primary: | Pulse Pressure During Activities of Daily Living Tests (Orthostatic Test) [ Time Frame: within 45 days of enrollment ] |
| 3. Secondary: | Change in Quality of Life [ Time Frame: baseline and 12 months ] |
| 4. Secondary: | Mode Reprogramming [ Time Frame: 12 months ] |
| 5. Secondary: | Atrial Fibrillation (AF) Burden [ Time Frame: 12 months ] |
| 6. Secondary: | Cardiac Symptoms [ Time Frame: 12 months ] |
| 7. Secondary: | Change in New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class [ Time Frame: baseline and 12 months ] |
| 8. Secondary: | Change in 6-minute Walk Test Distance [ Time Frame: baseline and 12 months ] |
More Information
Certain Agreements:
Limitations and Caveats
Results Point of Contact:
No publications provided
| Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study. | ||||||
| There IS an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed. | ||||||
The agreement is:
|
Limitations and Caveats
| Limitations of the study, such as early termination leading to small numbers of participants analyzed and technical problems with measurement leading to unreliable or uninterpretable data |
|---|
| No text entered. |
Results Point of Contact:
Name/Title: CLEAR Study CSE
Organization: BIOTRONIK, Inc.
phone: 503-451-8051
Organization: BIOTRONIK, Inc.
phone: 503-451-8051
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | Biotronik, Inc. |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00355797 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | 20060536 |
| Study First Received: | July 21, 2006 |
| Results First Received: | June 6, 2011 |
| Last Updated: | December 18, 2012 |
| Health Authority: | United States: Institutional Review Board |