Treatment of Prostate Cancer With Adjuvant Bevacizumab Plus Erlotinib
This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
Translational Oncology Research International
Collaborator:
Genentech
Information provided by:
Translational Oncology Research International
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00203424
First received: September 13, 2005
Last updated: May 24, 2011
Last verified: May 2011
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- Study Results
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Results First Received: April 12, 2011
| Study Type: | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Study Design: | Allocation: Non-Randomized; Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study; Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment; Masking: Open Label; Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Condition: |
Prostate Cancer |
| Intervention: |
Drug: Erlotinib + Bevacizumab |
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details
| Key information relevant to the recruitment process for the overall study, such as dates of the recruitment period and locations |
|---|
| Dates of recruitment period: 6/23/2005 - 03/10/2009 Types of location: Academic medical clinics and community medical clinics. |
Pre-Assignment Details
| Significant events and approaches for the overall study following participant enrollment, but prior to group assignment |
|---|
| There are no pre-assignment details to describe. |
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Erlotinib + Bevacizumab | 27 participants were screened for the study. 4 did not meet eligibility criteria,23 were registered to treatment period. 1 withdrew consent a day after registration and did not initiate study treatment.22 participants entered treatment period. Participants received Erlotinib every day for 24 weeks and Bevacizumab every 3 weeks for a total of 8 doses. The protocol instructed that pts be treated for 6 cycles. Of the 22 pts that started treatment, 11 completed the 6 cycles and the other 11 had to stop treatment prior to administration of 6th cycle. Of the 11 pts that did not complete all 6 cycles, 5 stopped treatment due to adverse event and were entered into the follow-up period. The 6 that stopped treatment due to withdrawal of consent and progressive disease did not enter the follow-up period. So 11 pts that completed 6 cycles of treatment plus 5 pts that did not complete 6 cycles of treatment due to an adverse event gives a total of 16 patients who entered follow-up period. |
Participant Flow for 2 periods
Period 1: Treatment Period
| Erlotinib + Bevacizumab | |
|---|---|
| STARTED | 22 [1] |
| COMPLETED | 11 [2] |
| NOT COMPLETED | 11 |
| Withdrawal by Subject | 4 |
| Adverse Event | 5 |
| progressive disease | 2 |
| [1] | 23 subjects registered for treatment, 1 withdrew consent after registration,22 received treatment. |
|---|---|
| [2] | Of 11 pts that did not complete treatment,5 stopped due to adverse event and entered followup period |
Period 2: Follow-up Period
| Erlotinib + Bevacizumab | |
|---|---|
| STARTED | 16 [1] |
| COMPLETED | 10 |
| NOT COMPLETED | 6 |
| Withdrawal by Subject | 1 |
| progressive disease | 4 |
| Lost to Follow-up | 1 |
| [1] | followup includes 11 pts that completed treatment + 5 pts who stopped treatment due to adverse event |
|---|
Baseline Characteristics
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Erlotinib + Bevacizumab | 27 participants were screened for the study. 4 did not meet eligibility criteria,23 were registered to treatment period. 1 withdrew consent a day after registration and did not initiate study treatment.22 participants entered treatment period. Participants received Erlotinib every day for 24 weeks and Bevacizumab every 3 weeks for a total of 8 doses. The protocol instructed that pts be treated for 6 cycles. Of the 22 pts that started treatment, 11 completed the 6 cycles and the other 11 had to stop treatment prior to administration of 6th cycle. Of the 11 pts that did not complete all 6 cycles, 5 stopped treatment due to adverse event and were entered into the follow-up period. The 6 that stopped treatment due to withdrawal of consent and progressive disease did not enter the follow-up period. So 11 pts that completed 6 cycles of treatment plus 5 pts that did not complete 6 cycles of treatment due to an adverse event gives a total of 16 patients who entered follow-up period. |
Baseline Measures
| Erlotinib + Bevacizumab | |
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants
[units: participants] |
22 |
|
Age
[units: years] Median ( Full Range ) |
67
( 51 to 76 ) |
|
Gender
[units: participants] |
|
| Female | 0 |
| Male | 22 |
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
[units: participants] |
|
| American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 |
| Asian | 2 |
| Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 |
| Black or African American | 0 |
| White | 20 |
| More than one race | 0 |
| Unknown or Not Reported | 0 |
Outcome Measures
| 1. Primary: | To Evaluate the Efficacy of Bevacizumab Plus Erlotinib [ Time Frame: Determined by time to tumor recurrence, as measured by rising prostate specific antigen (PSA) after radical prostatectomy. ] |
| 2. Primary: | Time to Tumor Recurrence [ Time Frame: Tumor progression assessed every 3 months during Follow-up Period for a maximum of 3 years after administration of first study treatment ] |
| 3. Secondary: | Time to Tumor Progression. [ Time Frame: Tumor progression assessed every 3 months during Follow-up Period for a maximum of 3 years after administration of first study treatment ] |
| 4. Secondary: | Overall Survival [ Time Frame: Survival status was assessed every 3 months after completion of study treatment for a maximum of 3 years after administration of first study treatment ] |
More Information
Certain Agreements:
Limitations and Caveats
Results Point of Contact:
No publications provided
| Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study. | ||||||
| There IS an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed. | ||||||
The agreement is:
|
Limitations and Caveats
| Limitations of the study, such as early termination leading to small numbers of participants analyzed and technical problems with measurement leading to unreliable or uninterpretable data |
|---|
| This was a small study with only 22 participants who received study treatment. With such a small sample size the study doesnt have the statistcical power to make categorical assessments or statements. |
Results Point of Contact:
Name/Title: Dr. Fairooz F. Kabbinavar, Chief Medical Officer
Organization: Translational Oncology Research International
phone: 310-824-1934
e-mail: FKabbina@mednet.ucla.edu
Organization: Translational Oncology Research International
phone: 310-824-1934
e-mail: FKabbina@mednet.ucla.edu
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | Fairooz Kabbinavar, Translational Oncology Research International |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00203424 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | TORI GU-01, 05-07-102 |
| Study First Received: | September 13, 2005 |
| Results First Received: | April 12, 2011 |
| Last Updated: | May 24, 2011 |
| Health Authority: | United States: Food and Drug Administration |