Head to Head Comparison of Azacitidine and Decitabine in Myelodysplastic Syndrome (H-1012-015-342)

This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Inho Kim, Seoul National University Hospital
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01409070
First received: July 28, 2011
Last updated: October 13, 2012
Last verified: October 2012

July 28, 2011
October 13, 2012
January 2011
December 2011   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Response rate [ Time Frame: 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Compare Azacitidine and Decitabine's treatment response rate in MDS patients
Same as current
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT01409070 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
  • Efficacy [ Time Frame: 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    To compare hematologic improvement between Azacitidine and decitabine
  • Survival rate [ Time Frame: 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    To compare survival rate between Azacitidine and decitabine
  • Number of participants with non-hematologic toxicities [ Time Frame: 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
    To compare toxicity between Azacitidine and decitabine
  • infection rate [ Time Frame: 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
    To compare infection rate between Azacitidine and decitabine
Same as current
Not Provided
Not Provided
 
Head to Head Comparison of Azacitidine and Decitabine in Myelodysplastic Syndrome
Head to Head Comparison of Azacitidine and Decitabine in Myelodysplastic Syndrome: Retrospective, Multicenter Study

In Myelodysplastic syndrome, epigenetic treatments such as Azacitidine and Decitabine have been highlighted in phase 3 studies. However, as the 1st line treatment, it has not been evaluated the head to head comparison of two drugs. This study is a retrospective study to compare the efficacy of two drugs.

Among 300 MDS patient, 200 of them have been taking Azacitidine and 100 of them have been taking Decitabine. Medical chart of these patients will be reviewed to assess the efficacy and safety between two agents.

Observational
Observational Model: Cohort
Time Perspective: Retrospective
Not Provided
Not Provided
Probability Sample

MDS patients who are diagnosed at SNUH

Myelodysplastic Syndromes
Not Provided
  • Azacitidine
    200 MDS patients taking Azacitidine will be assessed
  • Decitabine
    100 MDS patients taking Decitabine will be assessed
Not Provided

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Completed
300
December 2011
December 2011   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Confirmed MDS by bone marrow examination
  • Receiving azacitidine and decitabine as a first line chemotherapy
  • Adequate hepatic, cardiac, and renal function

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previously treated with another anti-cancer therapy due to MDS
  • Not available for clinical information
Both
18 Years to 80 Years
No
Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
Korea, Republic of
 
NCT01409070
H-1012-015-342
Not Provided
Inho Kim, Seoul National University Hospital
Seoul National University Hospital
Not Provided
Not Provided
Seoul National University Hospital
October 2012

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP