Evaluation of the Genu Neurexa Orthosis in Post Stroke Patients

This study is currently recruiting participants.
Verified October 2012 by Hadassah Medical Organization
Sponsor:
Collaborator:
Otto Bock Healthcare Products GmbH
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Hadassah Medical Organization
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01395576
First received: July 3, 2011
Last updated: October 28, 2012
Last verified: October 2012

July 3, 2011
October 28, 2012
February 2011
October 2013   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Spatiotemporal parameters [ Time Frame: Up to 3 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
stride time, step time, stance duration, swing duration, double support duration, stride length, step length, base width, toe out angle, cadence and velocity
Same as current
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT01395576 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
  • Dynamic EMG recordings [ Time Frame: Up to 3 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Surface EMG electrodes will be attached to 3 muscles on each leg for dynamic evaluation of dynamic muscle activation pattern during gait. Specifically, we will monitor the gastrocnemius, soleus, and rectus femoris in each leg
  • Sagittal angle of the paretic knee [ Time Frame: Up to 3 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Sagittal angle of the paretic knee
  • Functional evaluation [ Time Frame: Up to 3 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Functional evaluation of each subject will be accomplished using the Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT), 10-meter walk test, timed-up-and-go test (TUG) and Berg balance scale (BBS). The BBS is a 14-item scale, designed to measure balance in the clinical setting
Same as current
Not Provided
Not Provided
 
Evaluation of the Genu Neurexa Orthosis in Post Stroke Patients
Evaluation of the Genu Neurexa Orthosis in Post Stroke Patients

Post stroke patients often suffer from decrease in strength, loss of balance and gait asymmetry. Accordingly, these patients are at high risk for falls and fall-related injury. The presence of spastic or retracted muscles, e.g. the ankle plantar flexors or the quadriceps in combination with hamstrings weakness, causes knee hyperextension, which increases the stance phase duration and makes it difficult to achieve symmetrical gait. Additionally, this gait disorder can be painful as a result of stress to the ligaments and tendons at the posterior aspect of the knee.

The Genu Neurexa orthosis is designed to stabilize the knee, enable balance control and prevent hyperextension. In order to assess the effect of the orthosis on the gait and balance characteristics of stroke patients the investigators will conduct subjective patient's satisfactory questionnaire, complete physical and functional evaluation and gait analysis, as well as dynamic electromyography (EMG) muscle activation patterns. These examinations will be performed 3 times: at the beginning of the trial, after one month and after two months. The trial design is explained in the following paragraph.

The investigators hypothesize that the gait pattern will be improved while using the knee orthosis,as will be expressed by smaller base width and faster walking velocity etc.

The 8-week prospective, randomized controlled study design is depicted in Figure 1. The subjects will be randomly divided into two groups: group A (n=30) or group B (n=30). The patients will be randomly assigned to the study groups , using a block sampling method. The gait pattern, symmetry, and balance of each subject will be evaluated according to the tests described below. After the initial evaluation, group A will be fitted with the Genu Neurexa orthosis for the first four weeks of the study. Group B will not receive treatment for the first four weeks of the study. The subjects will be retested after 4 weeks. Then, group A will ambulate without the Genu Neurexa orthosis for the last 4 weeks. Group B will receive the Genu Neurexa orthosis for the last 4 weeks of the study. Both groups will be retested after 8 weeks for the time of enrollment. This design will provide intra-subject and inter-subject comparison.

The evaluation protocol:

The evaluation tools include subjective patient's satisfactory questionnaire, complete physical and functional evaluation and gait analysis (spatio-temporal parameters and paretic knee angle in the sagittal plane), as well as dynamic electromyography (EMG) muscle activation patterns. The evaluation tools are detailed below.

Gait analysis will be performed while subjects walk on a 6m-long walking path. First, video-recorded observational analysis through the coronal and sagittal planes will be performed in order to register the overall walking pattern and compensation mechanisms.

The main outcome measures will be spatiotemporal parameters (stride time, step time, stance duration, swing duration, double support duration, stride length, step length, base width, toe out angle, cadence and velocity) acquired using 4 markers.

Two-dimensional kinematics examination will be conducted using three markers, located on the paretic limb, in order to measure exact knee angle in the sagittal plane.

The subjects will be instructed to walk several times at their chosen speed on the path, while 4 cameras record the location of the markers. Post analyses, composed of marker identification and tracking (using commercial software by Simi Reality Motion Systems, Germany) and calculations of spatiotemporal parameters, will not be performed in the presence of the subject.

Finally, surface EMG electrodes will be attached to 3 muscles on each leg for dynamic evaluation of dynamic muscle activation pattern during gait. Specifically, we will monitor the gastrocnemius, soleus, and rectus femoris in each leg.

Complete physical evaluation will be conducted to assess range of motion of the joints and muscle tonus.

Functional evaluation of each subject will be accomplished using the Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT), 10-meter walk test, timed-up-and-go test (TUG) and Berg balance scale (BBS). The BBS is a 14-item scale, designed to measure balance in the clinical setting.

Interventional
Phase 2
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Crossover Assignment
Masking: Open Label
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Stroke
Device: Genu Neurexa orthosis
Knee orthosis for the prevention of knee hyper extension
Not Provided
Not Provided

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Recruiting
60
Not Provided
October 2013   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients suffering a first stro(at least 3 months post stroke)
  • Cognitive and cooperative ability to follo instructions.
  • Patients suffering from paresis of leg muscles resulting in knee hyperextension.
  • Ability to walk with or without a walking aid (cane, walker) independently

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Cognitive disorders preventing the subject from understanding the trial protocol, signing a consent form or following the researcher's instructions
  • Skin disease or wounds at the paretic knee
  • Ankle or foot contructure or limited range of motion
  • Orthopaedic injury to the paretic or non-paretic limbs
Both
18 Years to 65 Years
No
Contact: Isabella Schwartz, MD 972) -(0)2-5844474 Isabellas@hadassah.org.il
Contact: Sigal Portnoy, PhD (972) -(0)2-5844492 sigalp@hadassah.org.il
Israel
 
NCT01395576
GENU-HMO-CTIL
Not Provided
Hadassah Medical Organization
Hadassah Medical Organization
Otto Bock Healthcare Products GmbH
Not Provided
Hadassah Medical Organization
October 2012

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP