The Efficacy of Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Therapy for Management of Post-operative Pain Following Cesarean Delivery
| Tracking Information | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First Received Date ICMJE | June 24, 2011 | ||||
| Last Updated Date | March 23, 2012 | ||||
| Start Date ICMJE | May 2011 | ||||
| Primary Completion Date | January 2012 (final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||||
| Current Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
Pain score by visual analogue scale (VAS) on movement at 48 hours postoperatively [ Time Frame: 48 hours ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ] | ||||
| Original Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE | Same as current | ||||
| Change History | Complete list of historical versions of study NCT01383122 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site | ||||
| Current Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
|
||||
| Original Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE | Same as current | ||||
| Current Other Outcome Measures ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||
| Original Other Outcome Measures ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||
| Descriptive Information | |||||
| Brief Title ICMJE | The Efficacy of Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Therapy for Management of Post-operative Pain Following Cesarean Delivery | ||||
| Official Title ICMJE | The Efficacy of Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Therapy for Management of Post-operative Pain Following Cesarean Delivery: a Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study | ||||
| Brief Summary | Pain following Cesarean delivery remains the most common post-operative complaint, and the provision of effective and safe analgesia is very important. Pain can impede the mother's ability to mobilise, and to care for and breastfeed her newborn baby. Pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) devices have been used in various clinical settings, especially after plastic surgeries, to reduce postoperative swelling and pain, as well as to accelerate wound repair. PEMF therapy is simple to use, cost-effective and has no known side effects. Despite advances in post-operative analgesia, pain relief and maternal satisfaction remain inadequate in some patients. Improving the quality of post-Cesarean analgesia while limiting undesirable side effects will enhance maternal satisfaction and reduce the risk of post-operative complications. The investigators hypothesize that the continuous use of a PEMF device for 48 hours after Cesarean delivery will result in decreased post-operative pain scores on movement at 48 hours. |
||||
| Detailed Description | Currently, at our institution, analgesic regimens are multimodal, in that they combine analgesic drugs with differing mechanisms of action, with the aim of producing effective analgesia while minimising adverse effects. They include opioid drugs, administered both neuro-axially and systemically, as well as paracetamol and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Opioids, while effective, have significant adverse effects, including sedation, nausea, vomiting and constipation. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) can reduce opioid consumption, but also have side effects, and are contra-indicated in a significant number of patients. Therefore there remains considerable scope to improve post-Cesarean analgesia. Pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) technology relieves edema, inflammation and pain by stabilizing leaking cell membranes. The short bursts of electrical current do not produce heat or interfere with nerve or muscle function. The pulsed energy drives out edematous fluid along with by-products of the damaged tissue, which reduces swelling and helps re-establish cell-cell communication. The device is easily applied over the wound dressing, and has no known side effects for either the mother or the infant. As the rate of Cesarean delivery continues to increase, and there remain significant problems with current analgesic regimens, the use of pulsed electromagnetic field therapy has the potential to considerably improve acute and chronic post-Cesarean pain management, and lead to a widespread change in clinical practice. |
||||
| Study Type ICMJE | Interventional | ||||
| Study Phase | Not Provided | ||||
| Study Design ICMJE | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor) Primary Purpose: Treatment |
||||
| Condition ICMJE | Pain | ||||
| Intervention ICMJE |
|
||||
| Study Arm (s) |
|
||||
| Publications * | Not Provided | ||||
|
* Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline. |
|||||
| Recruitment Information | |||||
| Recruitment Status ICMJE | Terminated | ||||
| Enrollment ICMJE | 125 | ||||
| Completion Date | March 2012 | ||||
| Primary Completion Date | January 2012 (final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||||
| Eligibility Criteria ICMJE | Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
|
||||
| Gender | Female | ||||
| Ages | 18 Years to 55 Years | ||||
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers | Yes | ||||
| Contacts ICMJE | Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects | ||||
| Location Countries ICMJE | Canada | ||||
| Administrative Information | |||||
| NCT Number ICMJE | NCT01383122 | ||||
| Other Study ID Numbers ICMJE | 11-01 | ||||
| Has Data Monitoring Committee | No | ||||
| Responsible Party | Dr. Jose C.A. Carvalho, Mount Sinai Hospital | ||||
| Study Sponsor ICMJE | Samuel Lunenfeld Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital | ||||
| Collaborators ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||
| Investigators ICMJE |
|
||||
| Information Provided By | Samuel Lunenfeld Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital | ||||
| Verification Date | March 2012 | ||||
|
ICMJE Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP |
|||||