Prospective Multicenter Trial to Compare Preformed vs Non Preformed Orbital Implants (Orbita 3)

This study is currently recruiting participants.
Verified September 2012 by AO Clinical Investigation and Documentation
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
AO Clinical Investigation and Documentation
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01121159
First received: May 7, 2010
Last updated: September 20, 2012
Last verified: September 2012

May 7, 2010
September 20, 2012
June 2010
Not Provided
shape and volume assessing software [ Time Frame: up to 3 days after surgery ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
A post-op CT or CBCT scan will be analyzed with specially developed software that can compare shape and volume of the reconstruced orbit to the uninjured orbit.
shape and volume assessing software [ Time Frame: up to 3 days post-op ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
A post-op CT or CBCT scan will be analyzed with specially developed software that can compare shape and volume of the reconstruced orbit to the uninjured orbit.
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT01121159 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
  • shape and volume assessing software [ Time Frame: up to 3 days after surgery ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    6 specific points and regions in the orbit will be compared between the reconstructed and the non-affected orbit
  • Clinical tests to assess vision [ Time Frame: up to 3 days after surgery, 1 week after surgery, 4 weeks after surgery, 12 weeks after surgery ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Globe position, visual acuity, bulbus motility and diplopia will be assessed with clinical tests
  • Rate of complications [ Time Frame: up to 3 days after surgery, 1 week after surgery, 4 weeks after surgery, 12 weeks after surgery ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Complications will be documented at every follow-up
  • shape and volume assessing software [ Time Frame: up to 3 days post-op ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    6 specific points and regions in the orbit will be compared between the reconstructed and the non-affected orbit
  • Clinical tests to assess vision [ Time Frame: pre-op, up to 3 days post-op, 1 week post-op, 4 weeks post-op, 12 weeks post-op ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Globe position, visual acuity, bulbus motility and diplopia will be assessed with clinical tests
  • Rate of complications [ Time Frame: up to 3 days post-op, 1 week post-op, 4 weeks post-op, 12 weeks post-op ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Complications will be documented at every follow-up
Not Provided
Not Provided
 
Prospective Multicenter Trial to Compare Preformed vs Non Preformed Orbital Implants
A Prospective Multicenter Study to Compare the Accuracy of Posttraumatic Orbital Reconstruction of the Medial Orbital Wall and/or the Orbital Floor With Preoperatively Preformed Versus Non-preformed Orbital Plates

Accuracy of posttraumatic orbital reconstruction of the medial orbital wall and/or floor is better with preoperatively preformed orbital implants than with non-preformed orbital implants.

Not Provided
Observational
Observational Model: Cohort
Time Perspective: Prospective
Not Provided
Not Provided
Non-Probability Sample

patients with fractures of the orbital floor and/or medial orbital wall in one of the study centers

  • Orbital Floor Fracture
  • Medial Orbital Wall Fracture
Procedure: orbital fracture repair
All patients will receive orbital fracture repair with one of the 4 specified implants
  • Preoperatively preformed orbital plates
    Reconstruction with MatrixMIDFACE Preformed Orbital Plate (Synthes) or Custom-made orbital implant
    Intervention: Procedure: orbital fracture repair
  • Non-preformed orbital plates
    Reconstruction with Orbital Floor Mesh Plate or SynPOR Titanium Reinforced Fan Sheet (both Synthes)
    Intervention: Procedure: orbital fracture repair
Not Provided

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Recruiting
170
December 2013
Not Provided

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients ≥ 18 years
  2. Fracture (not older than 14 days) of the medial orbital wall and/or the orbital floor
  3. Scheduled for reconstruction surgery with one of the following implants:

    • MatrixMIDFACE Preformed Orbital Plate
    • Custom-made orbital implant
    • Orbital Floor Mesh Plate
    • SynPOR Titanium Reinforced Fan Sheet
  4. At least partial sight in both eyes before the accident
  5. Willingness and ability to participate in the study follow-up according to the protocol
  6. Ability to understand and read local language at elementary level
  7. Signed informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Bilateral orbital fracture
  2. Fractures of the orbital roof
  3. Comminuted zygoma fracture
  4. More than one piece fracture of the intraorbital bone lateral to the inferior orbital fissure
  5. Previous dislocated orbital fractures on either side
  6. Vision or diplopia not assessable
  7. Injury of the globe
  8. Neurological diseases with influence on eye motility or sight
  9. Legal incompetence
  10. Active malignancy
  11. Life-threatening condition
  12. Alcohol and drug abuse
Both
18 Years and older
No
Contact: Markus Zeppetzauer, MSc 0041 44 200 24 45 markus.zeppetzauer@aofoundation.org
United States,   Germany,   Singapore,   Spain
 
NCT01121159
Orbita 3
No
AO Clinical Investigation and Documentation
AO Clinical Investigation and Documentation
Not Provided
Not Provided
AO Clinical Investigation and Documentation
September 2012

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP