| March 5, 2009 |
| April 16, 2012 |
| May 2009 |
| February 2011 (final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| The Mean Change From Baseline to Week 2 in the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score [ Time Frame: baseline, week 2 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ] MADRS assesses severity of depressive symptoms. It ranges from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 60 (higher scores indicating a greater severity of depressive symptoms) |
| Change from baseline in the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MDRAS) global score at week 2 (V3, LOCF) endpoint in each treatment group. [ Time Frame: Week 2 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ] |
| Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00857584 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site |
- The Mean Change From Baseline to Week 1 in the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score [ Time Frame: baseline, week 1 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
MADRS assesses severity of depressive symptoms. It ranges from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 60 (higher scores indicating a greater severity of depressive symptoms)
- The Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score [ Time Frame: baseline, week 4 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
MADRS assesses severity of depressive symptoms. It ranges from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 60 (higher scores indicating a greater severity of depressive symptoms)
- The Mean Change From Baseline to Week 8 in the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score [ Time Frame: baseline. week 8 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
MADRS assesses severity of depressive symptoms. It ranges from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 60 (higher scores indicating a greater severity of depressive symptoms)
- The Mean Change From Baseline to Week 1 in the Clinical Impression Global Scale - Bipolar (CGI-BP-M) Total Score [ Time Frame: baseline, week 1 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
CGI-BP-M assesses severity of clinical status. It ranges from a minimum of 1 to a maximum of 7 ( higher scores indicating a greater clinical severity)
- The Mean Change From Baseline to Week 2 in the Clinical Impression Global Scale - Bipolar (CGI-BP-M) Total Score [ Time Frame: baseline, week 2 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
CGI-BP-M assesses severity of clinical status. It ranges from a minimum of 1 to a maximum of 7 ( higher scores indicating a greater clinical severity)
- The Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Clinical Impression Global Scale - Bipolar (CGI-BP-M) Total Score [ Time Frame: baseline, week 4 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
CGI-BP-M assesses severity of clinical status. It ranges from a minimum of 1 to a maximum of 7 ( higher scores indicating a greater clinical severity)
- The Mean Change From Baseline to Week 8 in the Clinical Impression Global Scale - Bipolar (CGI-BP-M) Total Score [ Time Frame: baseline, week 8 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
CGI-BP-M assesses severity of clinical status. It ranges from a minimum of 1 to a maximum of 7 (higher scores indicating a greater clinical severity)
- The Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HARS) Total Score [ Time Frame: baseline, week 4 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
HARS assesses severity of anxiety symptoms. It ranges from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 56 (higher scores indicating a greater severity of anxiety symptoms)
- The Mean Change From Baseline to Week 8 in the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HARS) Total Score [ Time Frame: baseline, week 8 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
HARS assesses severity of anxiety symptoms. It ranges from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 56 (higher scores indicating a greater severity of anxiety symptoms)
- Number of Patients Response at Week 1 [ Time Frame: week 1 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Number of patients responded to the treatment at week 1, where response is defined as ≥ 50% reduction in the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score from baseline to week 1.
MADRS assesses severity of depressive symptoms. It ranges from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 60 (higher scores indicating a greater severity of depressive symptoms.
- Number of Patients With Response at Week 2 [ Time Frame: week 2 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Number of patients responded to the treatment at week 2, where response is defined as ≥ 50% reduction in the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score from baseline to week 2.
MADRS assesses severity of depressive symptoms. It ranges from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 60 (higher scores indicating a greater severity of depressive symptoms.
- Number of Patients With Response at Week 4. [ Time Frame: week 4 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Number of patients responded to the treatment at week 4, where response is defined as ≥ 50% reduction in the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score from baseline to week 4.
MADRS assesses severity of depressive symptoms. It ranges from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 60 (higher scores indicating a greater severity of depressive symptoms.
- Number of Patients With Response at Week 8. [ Time Frame: week 8 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Number of patients responded to the treatment at week 8, where response is defined as ≥ 50% reduction in the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score from baseline to week 8.
MADRS assesses severity of depressive symptoms. It ranges from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 60 (higher scores indicating a greater severity of depressive symptoms.
- Number of Patients With Remission at Week 1. [ Time Frame: week 1 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Number of patients who achieved remission at week 1, where remission is defined as Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score ≤ 10.
MADRS assesses severity of depressive symptoms. It ranges from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 60 (higher scores indicating a greater severity of depressive symptoms.
- Number of Patients With Remission at Week 2. [ Time Frame: week 2 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Number of patients who achieved remission at week 2, where remission is defined as Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score ≤ 10.
MADRS assesses severity of depressive symptoms. It ranges from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 60 (higher scores indicating a greater severity of depressive symptoms.
- Number of Patients With Remission at Week 4. [ Time Frame: week 4 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Number of patients who achieved remission at week 4, where remission is defined as Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score ≤ 10.
MADRS assesses severity of depressive symptoms. It ranges from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 60 (higher scores indicating a greater severity of depressive symptoms.
- Number of Patients With Remission at Week 8. [ Time Frame: week 8 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Number of patients who achieved remission at week 8, where remission is defined as Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score ≤ 10.
MADRS assesses severity of depressive symptoms. It ranges from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 60 (higher scores indicating a greater severity of depressive symptoms.
|
- Change in the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and in the Young Mania rating Scale (YMRS) global score from baseline to each assessment (LOCF) endpoint in each treatment group. [ Time Frame: Every patient visit (week 1, week 2, week 4 and week 8) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Response rate, defined as % of patients with a reduction of MADRS global score =50% from baseline, in each assessment (LOCF) for each treatment group. [ Time Frame: Every patient visit (week 1, week 2, week 4 and week 8) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Change in the CGI-BP-M depression subscale and general scale score from baseline in each assessment (LOCF) for each treatment group. [ Time Frame: Every patient visit (week 1, week 2, week 4 and week 8) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
|
| Not Provided |
| Not Provided |
| |
| Quetiapine XR Versus Sertraline in Acute Bipolar Depression as add-on Therapy |
| Effectiveness of Quetiapine XR Versus Sertraline in Acute Depression as add-on Therapy to Previous Mood Stabilizer Treatment: a Pilot Study |
Prospective, open-label, controlled (active comparator), randomized study of 8 weeks follow-up for the evaluation of the efficacy of extended release quetiapine (quetiapine XR) versus Sertraline in addition to previous mood stabilizer treatment (lithium or valproate at stable and clinically therapeutic blood levels) in the treatment of the adult bipolar depression. This multicentric study will be featured in two sites in Spain. |
| Not Provided |
| Interventional |
| Phase 3 |
Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Open Label Primary Purpose: Treatment |
- Bipolar Disorder
- Bipolar Depression
|
|
|
|
|
| Not Provided |
| |
| Completed |
| 27 |
| February 2011 |
| February 2011 (final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adult ambulatory patients diagnosed of bipolar disorder I or II, current depressive episode (DSM-IV-TR 4ª Ed: 296.5x or 296.89 codes)
- Have been treated with only one mood stabilizer (lithium or valproate) in optimal and stable doses during at least the previous 4 weeks to randomization
- Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS-17) total score ≥ 20 and Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) total score ≤ 14 at the screening and randomization visits - Informed consent signed
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients with any axis I or II Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edition, text revision (DSM-IV-TR) diagnoses different from bipolar disorder I or II - Length of current depressive episode less than 2 weeks or more than 12 months
- Having been treated with more than one mood stabilizer or any mood stabilizer other than Lithium or valproate, any antidepressant, any antipsychotic or any CP450-3A inductor/inhibitor within the 7 days period prior to randomization
|
| Both |
| 18 Years to 65 Years |
| No |
| Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects |
| Spain |
| |
| NCT00857584 |
| D1443L00058 |
| No |
| AstraZeneca |
| AstraZeneca |
| Not Provided
| Not Provided
| AstraZeneca |
| March 2012 |