Pilot Study to Compare ISOVUE®-250 and VISIPAQUE™ 270 for Motion Artifact and Pain in Peripheral DSA

This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
Information provided by:
Bracco Diagnostics, Inc
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00740207
First received: August 20, 2008
Last updated: May 5, 2011
Last verified: May 2011

August 20, 2008
May 5, 2011
September 2008
July 2009   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Level of Pain in the Lower Extremities Scored by the Participants on the Visual Analog Scale Following Intraarterial Administration of ISOVUE-250 or VISIPAQUE 270 in Peripheral DSA. [ Time Frame: Immediately prior to power injection run and again immediately following power injection run ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
Visual Analog Scale: Patients were asked to mark on a 10 centimeter line where their pain was in the lower extremity of interest, in relation to the 2 extremes: no pain (0) on the far left and worst pain (10) on the far right. Pain Severity Scale: (0) None = VAS Score 0; (1) Mild = VAS Score 1-3; (2) Moderate = VAS Score 4-6; (3) Severe = VAS Score 7-10. Patients were assessed immediately prior to injection and again immediately following injection.
To compare pain in the lower extremities following intraarterial administration of ISOVUE-250 and VISIPAQUE 270 in peripheral DSA. [ Time Frame: During Procedure ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00740207 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
  • The Number of Participants With Motion Artifacts Following Intraarterial Administration of ISOVUE-250 or VISIPAQUE 270 in Peripheral DSA. [ Time Frame: Immediately postdose ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Using the following 5-point scale, the Investigator reviewed the images for motion artifact in vessels distal to the knee: 0 = None; 1 = Mild, not significant; 2 = Significant, but correctable; 3 = Degrades image quality; 4 = Images uninterpretable.
  • The Number of Participants Requiring Repeat Injection(s) Following Intraarterial Administration of ISOVUE-250 or VISIPAQUE 270 in Peripheral DSA. [ Time Frame: Immediately postdose ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    The Investigator assessed the images and recorded the number of repeat power injections required due to motion artifacts for each participant.
To compare the motion artifact and requirement for repeat injection(s) following intraarterial administration of ISOVUE-250 and VISIPAQUE 270 in peripheral DSA. [ Time Frame: During Procedure ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Not Provided
Not Provided
 
Pilot Study to Compare ISOVUE®-250 and VISIPAQUE™ 270 for Motion Artifact and Pain in Peripheral DSA
A Phase IV Pilot Study to Compare ISOVUE®-250 and VISIPAQUE™ 270 for Motion Artifact and Pain in Peripheral Digital Subtraction Angiography (DSA)

The purpose of this study is to compare ISOVUE-250 and VISIPAQUE 270 for motion artifact and pain following intraarterial injection for peripheral DSA.

Not Provided
Interventional
Phase 4
Allocation: Randomized
Endpoint Classification: Safety Study
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)
Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
Peripheral Arterial Occlusive Disease
  • Drug: VISIPAQUE 270
    VISIPAQUE 270 (Iodixanol Injection) is provided in bottles/flexible containers, ready to use sterile, pyrogen-free colorless to pale yellow solution
    Other Name: Iodixanol Injection
  • Drug: Isovue 250
    ISOVUE-250 (Iopamidol Injection) is provided in single dose bottles/vials, ready to use, aqueous, nonpyrogenic, colorless to pale yellow sterile solution
    Other Name: Iopamidol Injection
  • Active Comparator: Isovue 250
    Intervention: Drug: Isovue 250
  • Active Comparator: VISIPAQUE 270
    Intervention: Drug: VISIPAQUE 270
Not Provided

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Completed
33
July 2009
July 2009   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Inclusion Criteria:

Enroll a patient in this study if the patient meets the following inclusion criteria:

  • Provides written Informed Consent and is willing to comply with protocol requirements;
  • Is at least 18 years of age;
  • Is scheduled to undergo peripheral DSA for the diagnosis and/or treatment (PTA) of PAOD.

Exclusion Criteria:

Exclude a patient from this study if the patient does not fulfill the inclusion criteria, or if any of the following conditions are observed:

  • Is a pregnant or lactating female. Exclude the possibility of pregnancy:
  • by testing on site at the institution (serum or urine βHCG) within 24 hours prior to the start of investigational product administration,
  • by surgical history (e.g., tubal ligation or hysterectomy),
  • post menopausal with a minimum 1 year without menses;
  • Has any known allergy to one or more of the ingredients of the investigational products;
  • Has a history of severe congestive heart failure [class IV in accordance with the classification of the New York Heart Association (NYHA)]
  • Was previously entered into this study or received an investigational compound within 30 days before admission into this study;
  • Has a history of hypersensitivity to iodinated contrast agents;
  • Has renal impairment (eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2, calculated using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease [MDRD] study equation , );
  • Has any medical condition or other circumstances which would significantly decrease the chances of obtaining reliable data, achieving study objectives, or completing the study and/or postdose follow-up examinations.
Both
18 Years and older
No
Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
Not Provided
 
NCT00740207
IOP-113
No
Carmela Houston/ Sr. Manager Corporate Clinical Research, Bracco Diagnostics
Bracco Diagnostics, Inc
Not Provided
Study Chair: Steven N. Sireci, MD Bracco Diagnostics, Inc
Bracco Diagnostics, Inc
May 2011

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP