Negative Pressure Wound Therapy for the Treatment of Chronic Pressure Wounds (NPWT)
| Tracking Information | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First Received Date ICMJE | May 27, 2008 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Last Updated Date | July 25, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Start Date ICMJE | April 2009 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary Completion Date | May 2010 (final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Current Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
The primary outcome is the percent reduction in wound surface area, without surgery, at 12 weeks compared to wound measurements at treatment initiation following randomization. [ Time Frame: 12 Weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ] | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Original Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE | Same as current | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Change History | Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00691821 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Current Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
Wound healing, effectiveness, safety, healthcare resource utilization, costing, quality of life, cost effectiveness analysis [ Time Frame: 12 Weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ] | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Original Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE | Same as current | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Current Other Outcome Measures ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Original Other Outcome Measures ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Descriptive Information | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Brief Title ICMJE | Negative Pressure Wound Therapy for the Treatment of Chronic Pressure Wounds | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Official Title ICMJE | A 12-week, Prospective, Open-label, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial Comparing Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT) to Standard Wound Care for the Treatment of Chronic Pressure Wounds of the Pelvic Region | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Brief Summary | The purpose of this study is to assess the difference in the percent reduction in wound surface area, without surgery, of chronic pressure ulcers of the pelvic region for Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT) compared to the standard dressing. This study is designed to provide evidence regarding NPWT as compared to standard dressing regimens and compare the efficacy, safety, effectiveness and cost-effectiveness. |
||||||||||||||||||||
| Detailed Description | The Ontario Health Technology Advisory Committee recommended that a study should be completed due to the large numbers of patients needing chronic wound care and the increasing use of NPWT based on poor quality evidence to identify any potential indications for the use of NPWT. This study is designed to provide evidence regarding NPWT as compared to standard dressing regimens in Ontario and the results will serve as a benchmark for the utilization of NPWT in chronic pressure wounds, establishing and providing guidance regarding the use of NPWT in this population of subjects and to support policy decision making regarding the funding of the NPWT in the province. Specifically, this will compare the efficacy, effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of NPWT with standard dressing regimens for the treatment of chronic pressure ulcers of the pelvic region. This is a prospective, randomized, open-label, controlled clinical trial comparing standardized wound dressing (control arm) to NPWT (experimental arm) for the treatment of chronic pressure wounds of the pelvic region. NPWT will be performed using the Vacuum-Assisted Closure System (V.A.C.® Therapy™, KCI Medical Canada Inc., Mississauga, Ontario). NPWT will be compared to the present recommended state of the art wound dressings in subjects who would be candidates for either type of wound therapy. Both arms will receive standard wound care (e.g., debridement, preventative care, infection control, etc.). The efficacy, effectiveness, safety, and quality of life will be evaluated for standardized wound dressing versus NPWT. Complications associated with either form of wound care will be documented. An economic evaluation will be conducted in order to assess the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of NPWT compared to standard wound dressing. It is anticipated that 184 subjects will be enrolled and randomized over a 1.5 year period. All subjects providing consent and meeting inclusion/exclusion criteria will be randomized to either treatment arm and followed for 12 weeks. Patients who have wound closure within the 12-week study period will continue to have wound care visits as scheduled. All subjects will have Wound Evaluation Visits and Wound Dressing Change Visits. Wound Evaluation Visits will occur at baseline, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12 weeks after the date of randomization, where following removal of the dressing, a detailed wound assessment (e.g., wound characteristics, measurements) will be done and healthcare resource utilization will be collected. Disease specific quality of life measures and preference based quality of life measures (EQ-5D) will be collected at baseline, 6 weeks and at 12 weeks. Dressing Change Visits will occur as clinically required and the frequency of dressing changes per week will be allowed to vary over the 12 weeks of the study. During the dressing change visits, subjects will be monitored for wound infection and other complications. Subjects may be enrolled and randomized in the clinic and transferred to the community with continued follow-up completed by the appropriate Community Care Access Centre. |
||||||||||||||||||||
| Study Type ICMJE | Interventional | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Study Phase | Phase 4 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Study Design ICMJE | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Open Label Primary Purpose: Treatment |
||||||||||||||||||||
| Condition ICMJE |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| Intervention ICMJE |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| Study Arm (s) |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| Publications * | Not Provided | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
* Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
| Recruitment Information | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Recruitment Status ICMJE | Terminated | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Estimated Enrollment ICMJE | 184 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Completion Date | May 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary Completion Date | May 2010 (final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Eligibility Criteria ICMJE | Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| Gender | Both | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Ages | 18 Years and older | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers | No | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Contacts ICMJE | Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Location Countries ICMJE | Canada | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Administrative Information | |||||||||||||||||||||
| NCT Number ICMJE | NCT00691821 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Other Study ID Numbers ICMJE | HTA012-0801-01 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Has Data Monitoring Committee | No | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Responsible Party | Ron Goeree, MA Director of PATH Research Institute, St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, Associate Professor, Department CE&B, McMaster University, Programs for Assessment of Technology in Health (PATH) Research Institute | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Study Sponsor ICMJE | St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Collaborators ICMJE |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| Investigators ICMJE |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| Information Provided By | St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Verification Date | July 2011 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
ICMJE Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP |
|||||||||||||||||||||