Home Infusors for Analgesia After Foot Surgery
| Tracking Information | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First Received Date ICMJE | January 14, 2008 | ||||
| Last Updated Date | January 28, 2009 | ||||
| Start Date ICMJE | September 2008 | ||||
| Estimated Primary Completion Date | December 2009 (final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||||
| Current Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
worst pain [ Time Frame: first postoperative day ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ] | ||||
| Original Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE | Same as current | ||||
| Change History | Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00600899 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site | ||||
| Current Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
|
||||
| Original Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE | Same as current | ||||
| Current Other Outcome Measures ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||
| Original Other Outcome Measures ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||
| Descriptive Information | |||||
| Brief Title ICMJE | Home Infusors for Analgesia After Foot Surgery | ||||
| Official Title ICMJE | Use of Home Pumps for Analgesia After Ambulatory Foot Surgery - Comparison of Two Infusion Rates - a Randomized, Double-Blind Study | ||||
| Brief Summary | The purpose of this double blind, randomized study is to evaluate which rate and duration of infusion can be recommended for continuous perisciatic infusion of ropivacaine 2 mg/ml for analgesia after ambulatory foot surgery. |
||||
| Detailed Description | Protocol title: Use of home pumps for analgesia after ambulatory foot surgery - comparison of two infusion rates SUMMARY in English THE PURPOSE: The purpose of this double blind, randomized study is to evaluate which rate and duration of infusion can be recommended for continuous perisciatic infusion of ropivacaine 2 mg/ml for analgesia after ambulatory foot surgery. BACKGROUND: In the previous study (1) we showed that the continuous perisciatic infusion of 2 mg/ml ropivacaine 5 ml/h for 55 hours provided better analgesia than placebo after ambulatory foot surgery. Similar results are reported by Singelyn (2), Ilfeld (3) and White (4). But, different pumps with different basal infusion rates were used in these studies. Singelyn used infusion rate of 7 ml/h for 48 hours, while Ilfeld used mechanical pump with adjustable infusion rate, starting with 8 ml/h and patient controlled analgesia (PCA) 2 ml/20 minutes for 2 postoperative days. In our and White's studies elastomeric pumps with reservoir of 500 ml and infusion rate of 5 ml/h were used in 55 hours. Capdevila (5) has shown that the patients prefer elastomeric pumps because they cause fewer problems. That is why it will be our choice as well. The analgesic efficacy in our study was good as the patients in the treatment group had less pain and fewer sleep disturbances than in the placebo group. The question is whether higher infusion rate and longer duration would have an even better effect. The aim of this study is to compare (in a double blind manner) two different regimens for continuous perisciatic nerve infusion of ropivacaine 2 mg/ml after ambulatory foot surgery:
Design: A randomized, double blind study with 40 ambulatory patients who will undergo foot or ankle surgery. These patients will be randomized to receive either regimen 1. (5 ml/h for 55 hours) or regimen 2. (8 ml/h for 62 hours). The randomization procedure: sequentially numbered, sealed, opaque envelopes that contain computer produced random numbers for treatment allocation. Blinding procedures: pre-numbered identical containers marked with "Test drug", date of production and infusion start/end will be provided by the registered nurse (SK). The patient and the acute pain nurse (EB), who will evaluate the effect of these two treatments, will be blinded. On each of the 3 postoperative days the patients will be contacted by phone by the acute pain nurse and a standard questionnaire will be completed. The primary effect variable is worst pain on the first postoperative day evaluated as VAS score. |
||||
| Study Type ICMJE | Interventional | ||||
| Study Phase | Phase 4 | ||||
| Study Design ICMJE | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor) Primary Purpose: Treatment |
||||
| Condition ICMJE | Hallux Valgus | ||||
| Intervention ICMJE |
|
||||
| Study Arm (s) |
|
||||
| Publications * | Zaric D, Boysen K, Christiansen J, Haastrup U, Kofoed H, Rawal N. Continuous popliteal sciatic nerve block for outpatient foot surgery--a randomized, controlled trial. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2004 Mar;48(3):337-41. | ||||
|
* Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline. |
|||||
| Recruitment Information | |||||
| Recruitment Status ICMJE | Enrolling by invitation | ||||
| Estimated Enrollment ICMJE | 40 | ||||
| Estimated Completion Date | December 2010 | ||||
| Estimated Primary Completion Date | December 2009 (final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||||
| Eligibility Criteria ICMJE | Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
|
||||
| Gender | Both | ||||
| Ages | 19 Years to 80 Years | ||||
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers | No | ||||
| Contacts ICMJE | Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects | ||||
| Location Countries ICMJE | Denmark | ||||
| Administrative Information | |||||
| NCT Number ICMJE | NCT00600899 | ||||
| Other Study ID Numbers ICMJE | EudraCT2007-005180-10, 9445-DZ | ||||
| Has Data Monitoring Committee | Yes | ||||
| Responsible Party | Dusanka Zaric, Frederiksberg Hospital | ||||
| Study Sponsor ICMJE | Frederiksberg University Hospital | ||||
| Collaborators ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||
| Investigators ICMJE |
|
||||
| Information Provided By | Frederiksberg University Hospital | ||||
| Verification Date | January 2009 | ||||
|
ICMJE Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP |
|||||