Transvaginal Diagnostic Study in Women With Pelvic Pain
| Tracking Information | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First Received Date ICMJE | December 13, 2007 | ||||
| Last Updated Date | February 10, 2010 | ||||
| Start Date ICMJE | January 2008 | ||||
| Estimated Primary Completion Date | January 2010 (final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||||
| Current Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
To determine the safety and feasibility of the procedure. [ Time Frame: by January 2010 ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ] | ||||
| Original Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE | Same as current | ||||
| Change History | Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00574444 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site | ||||
| Current Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
Measurement of patient's post operative pain [ Time Frame: post-operative day 1 and post-operative day 7 ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ] | ||||
| Original Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
|
||||
| Current Other Outcome Measures ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||
| Original Other Outcome Measures ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||
| Descriptive Information | |||||
| Brief Title ICMJE | Transvaginal Diagnostic Study in Women With Pelvic Pain | ||||
| Official Title ICMJE | Laparoscopic Assisted Transvaginal Endoscopic Diagnostic Peritoneoscopy in Women With Pelvic Pain | ||||
| Brief Summary | We propose a phase I study of laparoscopic assisted, transvaginal peritoneoscopy by using flexible endoscopy in female patients with pelvic pain. It is designed as a hybrid procedure with laparoscopy using one port for adequate safety with the ultimate goal in the future that transvaginal NOTES can replace therapeutic pelviscopy for this indication. The standard number of port sites for diagnostic laparoscopy is 2-3. By reducing the number and size of laparoscopic port, patients should already experience benefits from this hybrid procedure. |
||||
| Detailed Description | Approximately 50% of patients with chronic pelvic pain will have a normal laparoscopy. The vast majority of women with endometriosis, chronic pelvic pain and absence of ovarian endometriomata determined by ultrasound will have revised ASRM Stage I or II (peritoneal) disease with preservation of the posterior cul-de-sac. This sparing of the posterior cul-de-sac may offer a preferable route of entry for endoscopic surgery compared to the current standard of care. Despite all the advantages of laparoscopic surgery, it is not free of risks and pain, and creates scars, which themselves are associated with complications such as abdominal wall hernias and adhesions. Within this scenario, a new surgical procedure has emerged, called natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES). This technique uses existing orifices of the body for introducing optical systems and surgical instruments into the peritoneal cavity by avoiding penetration of the abdominal wall. The expectations are no postoperative pain, optimal cosmesis without any visable scars and shorter recovery similar to therapeutic endoscopy. |
||||
| Study Type ICMJE | Interventional | ||||
| Study Phase | Phase 1 | ||||
| Study Design ICMJE | Allocation: Non-Randomized Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment Masking: Open Label Primary Purpose: Diagnostic |
||||
| Condition ICMJE | Pelvic Pain | ||||
| Intervention ICMJE | Procedure: transvaginal diagnostic peritoneoscopy
For patients with pelvic pain, a transvaginal procedure can be done to explore the abdomen. Entering through the vagina, will hopefully decrease the number of ports in the abdomen and decrease pain and healing time. |
||||
| Study Arm (s) | Not Provided | ||||
| Publications * | Not Provided | ||||
|
* Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline. |
|||||
| Recruitment Information | |||||
| Recruitment Status ICMJE | Withdrawn | ||||
| Estimated Enrollment ICMJE | 25 | ||||
| Estimated Completion Date | January 2010 | ||||
| Estimated Primary Completion Date | January 2010 (final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||||
| Eligibility Criteria ICMJE | Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
|
||||
| Gender | Female | ||||
| Ages | 18 Years and older | ||||
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers | Yes | ||||
| Contacts ICMJE | Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects | ||||
| Location Countries ICMJE | United States | ||||
| Administrative Information | |||||
| NCT Number ICMJE | NCT00574444 | ||||
| Other Study ID Numbers ICMJE | 1096837 | ||||
| Has Data Monitoring Committee | No | ||||
| Responsible Party | Klaus Thaler, MD, Department of General Surgery at University of Missouri, Columbia | ||||
| Study Sponsor ICMJE | University of Missouri-Columbia | ||||
| Collaborators ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||
| Investigators ICMJE |
|
||||
| Information Provided By | University of Missouri-Columbia | ||||
| Verification Date | February 2010 | ||||
|
ICMJE Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP |
|||||