| June 26, 2007 |
| December 10, 2012 |
| December 2006 |
| December 2011 (final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
- Tumor response rates, in terms of size, volume, contrast enhancement and PET avidity [ Time Frame: 2 to 3 months after treatment(s) up to 2 years ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Toxicity, which may include radiation induced liver damage, pain, consequences of shunting, toxic deaths. [ Time Frame: 2 years ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Survival time [ Time Frame: 2 years ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
|
- Tumor response rates, in terms of size, volume, contrast enhancement and PET avidity [ Time Frame: 2 to 3 months after treatment(s) up to 2 years ]
- Toxicity, which may include radiation induced liver damage, pain, consequences of shunting, toxic deaths. [ Time Frame: 2 years ]
- Survival time [ Time Frame: 2 years ]
|
| Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00493883 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site |
| Not Provided |
| Not Provided |
| Not Provided |
| Not Provided |
| |
| Use of TheraSphere® Yttrium-90 Glass Microspheres for Primary and Metastatic Liver Tumors |
| Use of TheraSphere® Yttrium-90 Glass Microspheres for Primary and Metastatic Liver Tumors |
The purpose of this study is to provide supervised access to treatment with TheraSphere® to eligible patients with primary and metastatic cancer and evaluate response to treatment, survival and toxicity.
The study has the following objectives:
- Provide supervised access to treatment with TheraSphere to eligible patients with primary and metastatic cancer to the liver.
- Evaluate patient experience and toxicities associated with TheraSphere treatment
- Evaluate predisposing factors that may influence results and toxicity
|
This study will use angiographic administration of radioactive TheraSphere® Yttirum-90 microspheres into the hepatic artery, to treat 50 patients with primary or secondary cancer involving the liver. The study population are those who have failed standard therapies, have a majority of their cancer in the liver, have a good performance status and reasonable hepatic function. Outcomes being studied are response to treatment, survival and toxicity.
- Range of patients who can be offered TheraSphere®
- Tumor response rates, in terms of size, volume, contrast enhancement and PET avidity
- Survival time
- Determine response in relation to histology and other parameters
- Ability to tolerate repeat treatments
- Toxicity, which may include radiation induced liver damage, pain, consequences of shunting, toxic deaths.
|
| Interventional |
Phase 1 Phase 2 |
Allocation: Non-Randomized Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment Masking: Open Label Primary Purpose: Treatment |
- Carcinoma, Hepatocellular
- Liver Neoplasms
|
| Device: yttrium Y 90 microspheres (TheraSphere®)
Y-90 is incorporated into very tiny glass beads, it can be injected into the liver through the blood vessels supplying the liver |
TheraSphere
Y-90 is incorporated into very tiny glass beads, it can be injected into the liver through the blood vessels supplying the liver
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Intervention: Device: yttrium Y 90 microspheres (TheraSphere®) |
- Campbell AM, Bailey IH, Burton MA. Tumour dosimetry in human liver following hepatic yttrium-90 microsphere therapy. Phys Med Biol. 2001 Feb;46(2):487-98.
- Herba MJ, Thirlwell MP. Radioembolization for hepatic metastases. Semin Oncol. 2002 Apr;29(2):152-9.
- Wong CY, Salem R, Raman S, Gates VL, Dworkin HJ. Evaluating 90Y-glass microsphere treatment response of unresectable colorectal liver metastases by [18F]FDG PET: a comparison with CT or MRI. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2002 Jun;29(6):815-20. Epub 2002 Mar 29.
- Goin JE, Salem R, Carr BI, Dancey JE, Soulen MC, Geschwind JF, Goin K, Van Buskirk M, Thurston K. Treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma with intrahepatic yttrium 90 microspheres: a risk-stratification analysis. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2005 Feb;16(2 Pt 1):195-203.
- Murthy R, Xiong H, Nunez R, Cohen AC, Barron B, Szklaruk J, Madoff DC, Gupta S, Wallace MJ, Ahrar K, Hicks ME. Yttrium 90 resin microspheres for the treatment of unresectable colorectal hepatic metastases after failure of multiple chemotherapy regimens: preliminary results. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2005 Jul;16(7):937-45.
- Wong CY, Qing F, Savin M, Campbell J, Gates VL, Sherpa KM, Lewandowski RJ, Nagle C, Salem R. Reduction of metastatic load to liver after intraarterial hepatic yttrium-90 radioembolization as evaluated by [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomographic imaging. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2005 Aug;16(8):1101-6.
- Salem R, Lewandowski RJ, Atassi B, Gordon SC, Gates VL, Barakat O, Sergie Z, Wong CY, Thurston KG. Treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma with use of 90Y microspheres (TheraSphere): safety, tumor response, and survival. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2005 Dec;16(12):1627-39.
- Lewandowski RJ, Thurston KG, Goin JE, Wong CY, Gates VL, Van Buskirk M, Geschwind JF, Salem R. 90Y microsphere (TheraSphere) treatment for unresectable colorectal cancer metastases of the liver: response to treatment at targeted doses of 135-150 Gy as measured by [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and computed tomographic imaging. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2005 Dec;16(12):1641-51.
- Sato K, Lewandowski RJ, Bui JT, Omary R, Hunter RD, Kulik L, Mulcahy M, Liu D, Chrisman H, Resnick S, Nemcek AA Jr, Vogelzang R, Salem R. Treatment of Unresectable Primary and Metastatic Liver Cancer with Yttrium-90 Microspheres (TheraSphere(R)): Assessment of Hepatic Arterial Embolization. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2006 Apr 29; [Epub ahead of print]
- Wong CY, Savin M, Sherpa KM, Qing F, Campbell J, Gates VL, Lewandowski RJ, Cheng V, Thie J, Fink-Bennett D, Nagle C, Salem R. Regional yttrium-90 microsphere treatment of surgically unresectable and chemotherapy-refractory metastatic liver carcinoma. Cancer Biother Radiopharm. 2006 Aug;21(4):305-13.
- Salem R, Thurston KG. Radioembolization with yttrium-90 microspheres: a state-of-the-art brachytherapy treatment for primary and secondary liver malignancies: part 3: comprehensive literature review and future direction. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2006 Oct;17(10):1571-93. Review.
|
| |
| Completed |
| 81 |
| December 2011 |
| December 2011 (final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age >= 18.
- Cancer visible in liver on CT,MR,US or PET scan.
- Primary cancer in the liver (hepatocellular carcinoma), or metastatic cancer involving the liver from a primary such as but not limited to lung, breast, colon, upper GI, neuroendocrine, melanoma.
- Life expectancy greater than 2 months
- Performance status of ECOG 2 or better (Ambulatory and capable of all selfcare, but unable to carry out any work activities. Up and about more than 50% of waking hours.)
- Patients have tried and/or are aware of all FDA approved therapies for their condition.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Vascular shunt that cannot be corrected.
- Bulky cancer outside of liver. Active cancer within the liver should be a greater volume than the active cancer outside the liver / in the remainder of body.
- Pregnancy
- Hematologic primary such as lymphoma, leukemia, myeloma.
- Body weight 300 lbs. and above
- Evidence of portal hypertension, splenomegaly or ascites.
|
| Both |
| 18 Years and older |
| No |
| Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects |
| United States |
| |
| NCT00493883 |
| CTCT 06-11 |
| No |
| Southwestern Regional Medical Center |
| Southwestern Regional Medical Center |
| Not Provided
| Principal Investigator: |
James P Flynn, MD |
Southwestern Regional Medical Center |
|
|
| Southwestern Regional Medical Center |
| January 2012 |