The Use of Anti-CD4 Monoclonal Antibody (mAb)-Fragment for the Imaging of Chronic Inflammation in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis
| Tracking Information | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First Received Date ICMJE | September 5, 2006 | ||||
| Last Updated Date | May 26, 2008 | ||||
| Start Date ICMJE | July 2007 | ||||
| Primary Completion Date | May 2008 (final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||||
| Current Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
safety and tolerability of this diagnostic agent [ Time Frame: duration of study ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ] | ||||
| Original Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
safety and tolerability of this diagnostic agent | ||||
| Change History | Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00372177 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site | ||||
| Current Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
endpoint for the proof of concept will be the number of patients needed to obtain a series of equal results [ Time Frame: duration of study ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ] | ||||
| Original Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
endpoint for the proof of concept will be the number of patients needed to obtain a series of equal results | ||||
| Current Other Outcome Measures ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||
| Original Other Outcome Measures ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||
| Descriptive Information | |||||
| Brief Title ICMJE | The Use of Anti-CD4 Monoclonal Antibody (mAb)-Fragment for the Imaging of Chronic Inflammation in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis | ||||
| Official Title ICMJE | The Use of Anti-CD4 mAb-Fragment for the Imaging of Chronic Inflammation in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis (an Open Proof of Concept Study) | ||||
| Brief Summary | Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a disease with a large economic impact due to the long lasting disabling nature of the disease. Furthermore, diagnosis of the disease is difficult and only a scheme with different symptoms is used to diagnose rheumatoid arthritis, often only by probability. Due to the fact that effective disease modifying pharmacological treatment is available and should be started early in established cases of RA, in combination with the adverse effect potential of these substances (e.g. methotrexate), a fast reliable diagnostic tool to diagnose rheumatoid arthritis would be highly appreciated by the medical community and the patients. Furthermore, for invasive treatments (surgery, puncture), an imaging method to display the activity pattern in different joints would be a major advantage. For the evaluation of the effectiveness of pharmacological therapy in rheumatoid arthritis, up to now, radiological measurements of the destruction process of the joints are used. This method has the disadvantage that it is time consuming insofar as changes in the radiological images must occur. It allows only an evaluation if the joints are destructed (which should be excluded by the new therapy regimen). Again, a quantifiable method for the determination of the effects of new therapeutic approaches would be highly appreciated. |
||||
| Detailed Description | The substance will be used as iv injection due to the protein nature of the antibody and, to ensure a fast distribution within the body. The study will be performed as an open clinical trial due to the fact that the applied radiation has to be documented; the use of "placebo" radiation would be unethical. It is expected, that the new antibody fragment with its radioactive linkage will display an image of the activity distribution of the disease. Due to the fact that only patients with active disease have to be imaged and, to allow for comparison of the activity and the clinical distribution of the disease, this proof of concept study (phase I study) will be performed in patients with active disease. Healthy volunteers could not display an activity pattern of the disease. Furthermore, it seems to be unethical to use volunteers for studies with radioactivity with such a risk/benefit ratio (radiation risks vs. missing chance of display of tissue distribution) in a proof of concept study. |
||||
| Study Type ICMJE | Interventional | ||||
| Study Phase | Phase 1 Phase 2 |
||||
| Study Design ICMJE | Allocation: Non-Randomized Endpoint Classification: Safety Study Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment Masking: Open Label Primary Purpose: Diagnostic |
||||
| Condition ICMJE |
|
||||
| Intervention ICMJE | Radiation: Fab-fragment of Anti-human CD4
Sterile lyophilized Powder for Preparation of a Solution and sterile labelling Buffer labelling with Tc99m-Pertechnetat Intravenous injection |
||||
| Study Arm (s) | Active Comparator: EP1645
Single-Dose
Intervention: Radiation: Fab-fragment of Anti-human CD4 |
||||
| Publications * | Not Provided | ||||
|
* Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline. |
|||||
| Recruitment Information | |||||
| Recruitment Status ICMJE | Completed | ||||
| Enrollment ICMJE | 5 | ||||
| Completion Date | May 2008 | ||||
| Primary Completion Date | May 2008 (final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||||
| Eligibility Criteria ICMJE | Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
|
||||
| Gender | Both | ||||
| Ages | 50 Years to 80 Years | ||||
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers | No | ||||
| Contacts ICMJE | Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects | ||||
| Location Countries ICMJE | Germany | ||||
| Administrative Information | |||||
| NCT Number ICMJE | NCT00372177 | ||||
| Other Study ID Numbers ICMJE | Biotectid POC EP 1645, EP 1645 | ||||
| Has Data Monitoring Committee | Yes | ||||
| Responsible Party | Biotectid GmbH | ||||
| Study Sponsor ICMJE | Biotectid GmbH | ||||
| Collaborators ICMJE |
|
||||
| Investigators ICMJE |
|
||||
| Information Provided By | Biotectid GmbH | ||||
| Verification Date | May 2008 | ||||
|
ICMJE Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP |
|||||