Effects of Carotid Stent Design on Cerebral Embolization
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
The goal of the proposed study is to contrast the relative efficacy of closed-cell stents versus open-cell stents in preventing periprocedural cerebral embolization in high-risk patients with symptomatic and asymptomatic extracranial carotid stenosis undergoing carotid artery stenting (CAS).
| Condition | Intervention |
|---|---|
|
Stroke Carotid Stenosis |
Device: closed-cell stent Device: Open-cell stent |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Single Blind (Outcomes Assessor) Primary Purpose: Prevention |
| Official Title: | Effects of Carotid Stent Design on Cerebral Embolization |
- Transcranial doppler counts of micro-embolic signals in the ipsilateral middle cerebral artery. [ Time Frame: First 24 hours after implantation of carotid stent ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Composite of any stroke, myocardial infarction or death [ Time Frame: within 30 days after the carotid stenting procedure ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Subclinical cerebral embolization assessed by brain diffusion-weighted MRI [ Time Frame: within 24 hours after carotid artery stenting ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
| Estimated Enrollment: | 40 |
| Study Start Date: | December 2008 |
| Estimated Study Completion Date: | February 2012 |
| Estimated Primary Completion Date: | December 2011 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
| Active Comparator: Closed-cell stent |
Device: closed-cell stent
Closed-cell stent: Comparison of two types of carotid stent designs (open- vs. closed-cell) regarding the primary and secondary outcomes.
Other Name: Carotid artery angioplasty
|
| Active Comparator: Open-cell stent |
Device: Open-cell stent
Open-cell Stent: Comparison of two types of carotid stent designs (open- vs. closed-cell) regarding the primary and secondary outcomes.
Other Name: Carotid artery angioplasty
|
Detailed Description:
Stroke is responsible for more than 10% of all deaths and much severe disability in developed countries. In the United States, approximately 600,000 new strokes are reported annually, of which 150,000 are fatal, and more than 4,000,000 surviving stroke victims are affected by significant disability. Seventy-five percent of strokes occur in the distribution of the carotid arteries and are considered of a thromboembolic etiology, most of which originate in carotid lesions. Carotid artery stenting (CAS) with cerebral embolic protection is currently the preferred treatment of carotid stenosis in high risk surgical patients, i.e., those with significant comorbidities or a hostile neck from previous surgical procedures or radiation. Although several predictors of adverse outcomes after CAS have been identified, the effects of device characteristics, including stent design, on neurologic adverse events have not been established.
The proposed study will be a randomized prospective controlled trial designed to test the hypothesis that the implantation of closed-cell stents for carotid lesions in high-risk patients will be associated with a reduced perioperative cerebral microembolization, as detected by transcranial Doppler and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of the brain, and reduced 30-day stroke, myocardial infarction, and death rates when compared with the implantation of open-cell stents.
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years and older |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- Subject is at high risk for carotid endarterectomy due to either anatomic or co-morbid conditions; AND
- Symptomatic patients (TIA or non-disabling stroke within 6 months of the procedure), with carotid stenosis ≥ 50% as diagnosed by angiography, using NASCET methodology (50); OR
- Asymptomatic patients with carotid stenosis ≥ 80% as diagnosed by angiography, using NASCET methodology
Exclusion Criteria:
- Conditions that interfere with the evaluation of endpoints
- Subject has anticipated or potential sources of cardiac emboli
- Subject plans to have a major surgical procedure within 30 days after the index procedure.
- Subject has intracranial pathology that makes the subject inappropriate for study participation.
- Subject has a total occlusion of the ipsilateral carotid artery (i.e., CCA).
- Severe circumferential lesion calcification that may restrict the full deployment of the carotid stent.
- Carotid stenosis located distal to the target stenosis that is more severe than the target stenosis.
Contacts and Locations| United States, Texas | |
| Dallas VA Medical Center | |
| Dallas, Texas, United States, 75216 | |
| Principal Investigator: | Carlos H Timaran, MD | Dallas VA Medical Center |
More Information
No publications provided by Dallas VA Medical Center
Additional publications automatically indexed to this study by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number):
| Responsible Party: | James LePage, PhD/ ACOS for Research, Dallas VA Medical Center |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00830232 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | IRB#08-035 |
| Study First Received: | January 26, 2009 |
| Last Updated: | August 5, 2011 |
| Health Authority: | United States: Federal Government |
Keywords provided by Dallas VA Medical Center:
|
Stroke Carotid stenosis stents |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Carotid Stenosis Constriction, Pathologic Stroke Carotid Artery Diseases Cerebrovascular Disorders Brain Diseases |
Central Nervous System Diseases Nervous System Diseases Arterial Occlusive Diseases Vascular Diseases Cardiovascular Diseases Pathological Conditions, Anatomical |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 19, 2013